Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Harris's avatar

Thank you for the reference and kind words. The rage I feel about how position-player pitching ruins statistical integrity could perhaps be termed irrational since there are all of these thorny points like sacrifice flies that have been handled in different ways through the years and then not retroactively "corrected." Some would also say that .300 in 1925 meaning something very different than .300 in 2025 constitutes just as important a discrepancy, even though it's theoretical in nature. But I think not caring about the exact numbers at all in the name of the big picture would represent a slippery slope, and would eventually mean that we didn't care about their meaning, either. So I will continue to fight the good fight.

No posts

Ready for more?